I expect out of state CS was well in to single digits. Out of state admit rate was 13% last year. There are specific non-stat evaluation criteria, and they should not be assumed to be unimportant.įurthermore GT is extremely competitive. GT’s website lists the specific evaluation criteria, which fits with the CDS list. The OP may not be as strong in these “very important” criteria as they are in the seemingly less important test scores. However, they do mark things like character/personal qualities, volunteer work, work experience and essays as most important. In GT’s CDS, they do not mark test scores as very important for admission. What is known is high test scores, so I’m guessing “better stats” primarily means better test scores. It’s unclear how high the OP’s GPA is since weighting is unknown. Doing very well on one consideration does not mean the applicant does equally well on the many other admission considerations. This occurs because admission considers far more than test scores. For example a 36 ACT might be higher than most admitted students, yet the vast majority of 36 ACT applicants were rejected. The admit rate was often low for the highest test score group. Prior to COVID test optional, many highly selective colleges posted admit rate by test score. Having better stats than most who are admitted does not mean admit rate is high for that stat group. If they do, it has nothing to do with your son who has very good stats. Perhaps GT yield protects, perhaps they do not. But I have not seen the full app and even if I did, it is hard to know why one kid makes it and the other one does not. I am simply saying the OPs DD has better stats than most than many that have been accepted.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |